The Future Party

Three Story Lines Revisited

Dave Davis Commentary, Policy, The Future Party, The Middle East, Uncategorized , , , ,

It was a busy week with significant developments. Three of them fall in areas I’ve commented on in the past. It’s crucial to compare where we are with what I wrote on the third parties, the Gaza war, and abortion, as these past commentaries hold significant relevance to our current situation.

In my series, ‘The Future Party” (On this Site), I stressed the pressing need for a more competitive political landscape. We must enhance our choices at all levels. Recent presidential elections have presented us with candidates most Americans didn’t want to vote for. The current election, featuring two widely unpopular candidates, is a stark reminder of this issue. The ‘No Labels Party,’ which pledged to offer more options, should’ve thrived in this climate. While it has made progress in securing spots on state ballots, they’re facing a lot of work getting candidates. 

In my series, ‘The Future Party,” I concluded that you can’t defeat someone without one and must stand for something. I based my brief involvement with the emerging Howard Shultz third-party campaign on crafting a platform for the Starbucks founder to champion. However, no such platform materialized, and Shultz withdrew when it appeared he could potentially harm the Democrats, thereby inadvertently supporting the re-election of the Republican incumbent. This excuse is a stark reminder that new voices must have substance and conviction to make a lasting impact.

Continue reading →

Going The Way Of The Whigs

Dave Davis Commentary, Policy, The Future Party, Uncategorized , , , ,

Tackling our problems requires both sides’ best ideas to implement agreed-upon solutions. Instead, we have Gridlock on the border and aid to our friends. Reforming entitlements before they devour us is willfully ignored.

While both parties contribute to our inabilities, the new Democratic ticket may bring different thinking. I doubt it, but we have to wait and see. On the other hand, the Republicans will do whatever Donald Trump dictates. It’s best to take up the Republicans first and hold back on the Democrats.

Laying to rest any question Trump now dominates the Republican Party is confirmed by the party’s recent actions. Blocking the compromise Bill to Fund Ukraine, Israel, and our southern border before anyone even read it because Trump wanted the Border issue for the election. At that point, you couldn’t claim you were objecting to something in the bill because no one had seen the finished product. Republicans bowed to Trump’s needs instead of making inroads into the problems. 

The recent changes at the Republican National Committee add to the conclusion of Trump’s dominance. Appointing his daughter-in-law as co-chairman and wholesale replacing long-term employees with Trump loyalists leave no illusions about who the boss is.

Continue reading →

I Have My Reasons

Dave Davis Commentary, Policy, The Future Party, Uncategorized , , , ,

In the last post, I stated people should back the person most closely aligned with their principles and goals that can get elected. People have pointed out that former President Trump is leading Biden in several polls, so why am I not supporting him? The simple reason is that we disagree on important issues, precisely his stance on capitalism vs. state-directed economies and his subservience to bureaucratic elites. 

That doesn’t mean I didn’t applaud his tax cuts, opposing more regulations, and solid court appointments. Support for Israel while containing Iran led to the Abraham Accords. Providing real weapons to Ukraine kept Russia at bay. 

Trump’s stance on Capitalism vs. State-directed economies, as characterized by protectionism, debt, and immigration, however, revealed Trump’s less attractive side. Subservience to bureaucratic elites, Trump clashed with my fundamental values. 

A bedrock belief in markets allocating resources rather than self-serving elites makes me hostile to industrial policies. These policies, characterized by state intervention in the economy, have historically proven ineffective and often disastrous. 

After freeing up markets and achieving remarkable growth, China is reverting to the state direction of the economy with the expected results; growth is decelerating. Soon, it will join the old Soviet Union, Cuba, Venezuela, and Argentina as countries that could be rich but choose to move backward.

Speaking of Argentina, the new president, Javier Milie, explains the differences between capitalism’s successes and the failures of statism in his address before the World Economic Forum. I only wish I had his passionate ability to make the case for markets and the people rather than the state making decisions. One can only hope he will get the support to return Argentina to its place among wealthy nations.

A state-directed economy is only possible by separating a nation from competing goods and ideas. Protectionism through tariffs is a primary tool. Trump loves tariffs. He imposed them to protect our steel and washing machine industries. While he saved some jobs in the protected sectors, the data shows he lost more jobs among the users of tariff-protected products such as autos and washing machines using the now higher price steel, making them less competitive.

Continue reading →

We Deserve A Better Leader

Dave Davis Commentary, Policy, The Future Party, The Middle East, Uncategorized , , , ,

Three dead, and dozens hurt, the result of a suicide drone attack on a U.S. base in Jordan. It was just a matter of time before U.S. troops died, according to Gen. Keith Kellogg on Fox News. After 160+ attacks on U.S. troops in Syria and Iraq, added to assaults on shipping in the Red Sea, the Biden administration had repeatedly told Iran and its surrogates, “Don’t,” but they did. Still, administration spokespeople’s recurrent theme is, “We don’t seek a wider war.” 

Remember, as recently as 9/29/23, the national security advisor Jake Sullivan claimed the Mideast is the quietest in decades. Now, Anthony Blinkin says we face the most significant Mideast problem since 1973. Since the October 7th horrific attack, the hostilities have spread from Israel and Gaza to Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, the Red Sea, Yemen, and now Jordan. A war already rapidly widening. From the quiet of the Abraham Accords and a restrained Iran at the end of the last administration to the present mess, you can’t avoid the conclusion it’s the result of Biden’s policies.

Besides removing sanctions allowing a massive increase in Iran’s oil revenues and unblocking Billions of dollars, which allowed the Mullahs to finance the increase in the terrorist activities of their surrogates, the administration also re-instated aid to The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNWRA). Years ago, I pointed out in posts on the Middle East that this agency was far from being a force for good. It served only to prolong and deepen problems. 

Instead of facilitating Palestinian resettlement in the Arab world, it kept them in camps, with only their hatred and families increasing. UNWRA schools taught hostility to Jews. President Trump’s U.N. Ambassador, Nikki Haley, aware of its failings, successfully pushed the U.S. to defund the wayward agency. However, Biden restored funding and added even more discretionary funds.

Now we find UNWRA employees took part in Hamas’ ghastly attack on Israel. Evidence shows at least one in ten of its staffers have ties to the terrorist group. Believe it or not, the U.S. Taxpayers supported the terrorists. Even with UNWRA’s widely known flaws, Biden gave them funds, much of it ending up with Hamas financing its horrors.

I can’t prove my earlier idea that a quiet but robust alliance between Israel, the U.S., and the Kurds would’ve kept a lid on the Mideast caldron, allowing the area to evolve into modernity. Still, it couldn’t have worse results than we have now. Even in a limited form under Trump, maintaining the Harir airbase in Kurdistan and solid support of Israel allowed some Arab nations to join in the Abraham Accords, with others likely to follow. Wouldn’t it be better to have our own strategically placed proxies?

Continue reading →

Business Giving Us the Business

Dave Davis Commentary, Policy, The Future Party, Uncategorized

“I believe, as a conservative, the job of government is, in the main, to stay out of the business of business,” said former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie. He added, “I don’t think we should be heavily regulating business.” He offered these comments in criticism of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis’ feud with Disney. He is joined in this disapproval by former South Carolina Governor Nicki Haley, New Hamshire Governor Chris Sununu, and of course, former president Donald Trump.

How do we account for their support for Disney versus the Florida Governor?”I believe, as a conservative, the job of government is, in the main, to stay out of the business of business,” said former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie. He added, “I don’t think we should be heavily regulating business.” He offered these comments in criticism of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis’ feud with Disney. He is joined in this disapproval by former South Carolina Governor Nicki Haley, New Hamshire Governor Chris Sununu, and of course, former president Donald Trump. How do we account for their support for Disney versus the Florida Governor?

The bout started when Disney opposed Florida’s Parental Rights in Education Act. The law prohibits “Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.”

 Further, “…at least seven Florida counties that could remove parents from important conversations about their children’s gender identity. The law now makes these policies illegal.” Parents now must be notified of their child’s “transitioning. While labeled “the Don’t Say Gay Bil,” it, in fact, never uses the term “Gay.” 

In what world do “conservatives” support a company whose principal market is young children, campaigning for the sexualization of 3rd graders and younger? Do they concur parents shouldn’t be told of their children contemplating taking dangerous drugs and getting surgeries?

The ire of these contenders centers on Desantis returning fire by changing Disney’s special governing powers. Punishing the company for threatening the state democratically passing a law isn’t acceptable to them. 

Make no mistake, Disney was threatening Florida. We’ve seen this show before. A significant company comes out against some bills it doesn’t like even though it doesn’t directly affect its business and receives favorable press from the mainstream media. Soon it’s joined by others. The state loses business and significant events. The state is hurt.

Continue reading →