Republicans For Industrial Policy?

In my last post, the case of Disney, a major corporation attempting to intervene against a duly passed Florida law banning the sexualization of third grades and under and requiring informing parents of a child transitioning, highlights big business going in a new direction.

Among those criticizing Florida Governor Ron DeSantis for standing up to Disney are prominent Republicans, including other presidential candidates. With this in mind, I’ve been pondering Larry Kudlow, Trump’s top economic advisor, claiming the next election will turn on economic policies. Where are the Republicans on this?

In the past, Republicans followed Reagan in relying on capitalism and markets to drive us forward. Industrial policy found favor with democrats. Lately, some prominent Republicans have been echoing the “the Government Knows Best” line. Beyond the sizeable number signing on to the heavy subsidies underlying “The Chips Bill,” Senators Tom Cotton, Marco Rubio, J.D.Vance, and Todd Young recently spoke at an event organized around a policy manifesto called “Rebuilding American Capitalism: A Handbook for Conservative Policymakers.”

Signing on to this manifesto aligns these senators with those claiming capitalism hasn’t produced for America, so the economy needs government direction. The belief outsourcing “good paying manufacturing jobs” in the Rust Belt underlies the decline in the middle class and forms the basis of the manifesto. The idea is to bring these jobs back by giving subsidies, imposing tariffs, and strengthening unions. 

These Republicans have concluded Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and Ronald Reagan have no validity in today’s world and that a form of state corporatism is superior. In my series “The Long Journey To More'” I pointed out the fallacy of this position.

Further, this stance has little factual basis. Automation replaced far more workers than outsourcing. In both cases, high labor costs in the U.S. forced employers to make economic decisions. However, manufacturing continues to grow here even as manufacturing jobs decline.

High Union wages and inflexible work rules led to the migration of manufacturing to right-to-work states, mainly in the South and abroad. Bringing these jobs back to the Rust Belt in any number can only be done at a very high cost, especially if the jobs are unionized. 

While China gained unfairly with subsidies to specific industries such as steel, other friendly nations benefited from globalization as well. Building a fortress America producing everything here is a pipe dream. We can’t make everything and must sell farm goods to others. We have more job openings than people looking for work now. Where would we even get the people to produce everything we need? Higher costs will add to inflation.

While we expect progressives to indulge in fantasies, Republicans should know better. Since the rise of capitalism, no government-directed economy has produced anything close to its results. An elite group of “brilliant” people at the top never matched the mass market’s verdicts. One reason is people will always make mistakes; the market punishes the failure and directs resources in successful directions. Political leaders are loathe to admit defeat. As we’ve seen, stakeholders demand bailouts rather than lose out.

Republicans must be aware of today’s industrial policy. A significant part of which is the Green New Deal. Its present form is simple-produce all our electricity with solar and wind to power everything. Plug in your Industry, your home, and transport. Subsidies, regulations, and protection will make it happen quickly to save the planet. What could go wrong?

Unlike Ford, GM, and others, the #2 auto producer Toyota has resisted the total Electric Vehicle approach. Its lineup in the future includes hybrids and hydrogen-powered vehicles. The company has a long successful history with gas-electric, but why hydrogen? As a significant heavy truck producer, it knows electricity with its heavy batteries isn’t suitable for large loads. Hydrogen makes more sense. That fact will spread hydrogen stations across the world.

While hydrogen presently requires large amounts of electricity, naturally occurring hydrogen may become available. How ironic is it oil and gas drillers have run across deposits in the past but were not needed then? Using A.I. to go back over their data could be illuminating. The same oil and gas industry may still power the future.

We are still determining if hydrogen or another source will power us. The truth is nobody knows. Rather than betting the house wind and solar to power everything, including autos, the capitalist solution is to let the market sort it out. 

We’ve seen enough results of significant decisions by ruling elites that people wouldn’t do without mandates. China’s one-child policy and the extended covid lockdowns come readily to mind. Those disasters will affect us far into the future.

Republicans have to figure out who they are. Adopting capitalism has bought “More” by far than any other system. Why would you want to copy the top-down Soviet economy that lost the cold war to be another failed industrial policy state?

As China turns away from the free market, maintaining classical liberal policies here will leave it in the dust. It worked before, and there is no reason to think it won’t work again.

Rather than erecting trade barriers, let’s widen trade with our friends. Trump and the Democrats dumped the Trans-Pacific Partnership. We have yet to conclude a liberal trade agreement with the U.K. Rather than trying to do the impossible of producing everything here, let us diversify our supply chains with friends and those obeying the rules.

Most countries know China’s problems and are making market decisions to rely less on that nation. We should join them. As China loses business, it may even change. With a rapidly aging, unbalanced population China might become aware it needs to return to markets and friendly trading partners.

Some Republicans hold up Trump’s anti-trade tirades and tariffs. For all his bluster, his trade deals favored expanded trade, and his tariffs only hurt us. How can you follow a guy who thinks China pays the taxes rather than our importers? We write the checks right here.

Republicans signing on to Industrial Policies need to switch parties or do some summer reading. Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations, Frederick Hayek’s Road to Serfdom, and the more recent Super Abundance by Marian L. Tupy and Gayle L. Pooley might give them some idea of what works. If you want to win, this is a place to start.

Business Giving Us the Business

“I believe, as a conservative, the job of government is, in the main, to stay out of the business of business,” said former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie. He added, “I don’t think we should be heavily regulating business.” He offered these comments in criticism of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis’ feud with Disney. He is joined in this disapproval by former South Carolina Governor Nicki Haley, New Hamshire Governor Chris Sununu, and of course, former president Donald Trump.

How do we account for their support for Disney versus the Florida Governor?”I believe, as a conservative, the job of government is, in the main, to stay out of the business of business,” said former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie. He added, “I don’t think we should be heavily regulating business.” He offered these comments in criticism of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis’ feud with Disney. He is joined in this disapproval by former South Carolina Governor Nicki Haley, New Hamshire Governor Chris Sununu, and of course, former president Donald Trump. How do we account for their support for Disney versus the Florida Governor?

The bout started when Disney opposed Florida’s Parental Rights in Education Act. The law prohibits “Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.”

 Further, “…at least seven Florida counties that could remove parents from important conversations about their children’s gender identity. The law now makes these policies illegal.” Parents now must be notified of their child’s “transitioning. While labeled “the Don’t Say Gay Bil,” it, in fact, never uses the term “Gay.” 

In what world do “conservatives” support a company whose principal market is young children, campaigning for the sexualization of 3rd graders and younger? Do they concur parents shouldn’t be told of their children contemplating taking dangerous drugs and getting surgeries?

The ire of these contenders centers on Desantis returning fire by changing Disney’s special governing powers. Punishing the company for threatening the state democratically passing a law isn’t acceptable to them. 

Make no mistake, Disney was threatening Florida. We’ve seen this show before. A significant company comes out against some bills it doesn’t like even though it doesn’t directly affect its business and receives favorable press from the mainstream media. Soon it’s joined by others. The state loses business and significant events. The state is hurt.

Continue reading

So What Do We Do?

My last post pointed out that the majority is now at the mercy of some minorities, and our communities are declining. Our political system has fallen prey to extreme minorities, but a reader asked how to fix it. I still think some past recommendations could make a difference. Maybe we can build on them.

Political parties exist for only one reason, to win elections. Primaries subvert the party’s mission instead of finding attractive positions on issues and finding candidates likely to succeed in implementing them. Candidates exposing extreme and generally unpopular positions can appeal to just enough primary voters to take places on the ballot rather than somebody who could win. I covered this in the series “The Future Party.”

If the Republicans and Democrats weren’t committed to primaries, would they run Biden or Trump? The two significant parties are frightened at the prospect; the new “No Labels Party” looks at candidates appealing to the broad middle range of voters who could win. If they weren’t likely to nominate two old guys most people don’t want; they wouldn’t be so terrified. At least “No Labels” knows what it’s in business to achieve.  

A curveball in this scenario could be one of these two candidates pulling out or having to pull out in favor of a younger, more popular candidate. The other party would be stuck with an unpopular oldster. Given their ages, health might result in such an unexpected outcome.

Another impediment to majorities regaining control is our segmented media. Most media outlets aim at slices rather than appealing to general audiences, and presenting information deviating from what that crowd believes could cost them big time.

Continue reading

Tyranny of the Minority

To have a functioning society, we expect the government to provide a framework allowing us to go about our everyday lives without fear for the safety of our families, property, or ourselves and protect the vast majority from those seeking to threaten or restrict us. 

In our Republic, we’re supposed to let the majority rule on most things while protecting minorities or individuals from the “tyranny of the majority.” The fear of even transitory majorities taking advantage of others led to the promise of history’s first written protections even against the majority to gain acceptance of our Constitution—the first ten amendments, known as the” Bill of Rights,” allayed fears. These protections are a large part of the genius of our constitutional government.

Minorities take over our streets, making many parts of our cities disastrous. Minorities commit crimes with small or no price. Too much of a good thing can make you sick. In many cases today, the tail wags the dog.

How did our protection of minorities and even individuals morph into a “tyranny of the minority”? In his book “Rules for Radicals, ” community organizer Saul Alinsky proposed a rule that makes “the enemy live up to their own rules.” This rule has meant appealing to the majority’s best nature to lure the majority to bend to your will.

Continue reading